Details

At the end of the article about Jeromy Burntiz's day yesterday (woke up, flew to Pittsburgh from California, took a physical, signed a contract, flew back to Cali in time for the Rose Bowl, incidentally if everything lived up to its hype the way that game did we'd have nothing to worry about for the Pirates next season) we've got a fantastically patronizing quote from Dave Littlefield.

(Littlefield) also said he did not intend to trade Craig Wilson, even though Burnitz and Casey would start in right field and first base, Wilson's two positions, and even though Wilson could make $4 million or more next season.

"Whether it's media or fans, everybody has to realize that, if we are going to get better, part of it is having better backups," Littlefield said. "Through ownership, we've been able to increase payroll, so you're going to have the opportunity to have quality backups. Craig brings things that we need. He has power, gets on base and has versatility in the field. To me, that piece makes a lot of sense for us."

Dave is of course forgetting two things. First off, he absolutely is thinking about trading Craig Wilson, he just said that to keep people from getting too angry. Secondly, it's not paying Craig Wilson $4 million to sit on the bench that we're angry about. It's paying someone worse than him $6 million to start over him. I love the second to last sentence, too. He justifies Craig Wilson as a bench player because he gets on base and has power, like there's something else to hitting besides getting on base and having power (which is the exact definition of OPS, On-base Plus Slugging). Maybe my "Evil Genius" series is misguided. Maybe DL is just an idiot.

UPDATE (8:03 PM)- Somehow, I forgot to add that comments like the one Littlefield made in the paper today are EXACTLY why I think he's an evil genius. Now that he's talked down Wilson and done his best to convince the fans that Craig Wilson is worthless, he hits the key talking points that a team like Oakland (where Craig would be the best fit) would want to hear. After a month full of not caring about things like OPS, it's the key point in his "why Craig Wilson is a backup) spiel. This is why I really think Littlefield can't be as stupid as he appears to be, whenever it suits him, things like OPS or on-base percentage come up. He knows that the average fan doesn't know or care what it is though, and so it's ignored when building a team.

Popular posts from this blog

WHYGAVS has moved

It's official. WHYGAVS now has a new official home. It's actually at WHYGAVS.com , which means that it's the same as the old home, but I'm off Blogger now, which means that this old link won't redirect. You'll have to subscribe to a new feed if that's how you read WHYGAVS, but beyond that things are going to be mostly the same.
Read more

Links

For reasons that will become shortly apparent, I've been working on cleaning/updating the sidebar links. That means that I've got some new links to add to the sidebar, as well as some other things for your general perusal. Cory Humes, Geeves, and Alan from Bucco Wire are all blogging again at MVN under the header Pirate Revolution . There's also The Green Weenie and The 'Burgh Blues , two blogs I should've added some time ago. Meanwhile, Dejan's series about the Pirates' presence in the Dominican is awesome. I'm sure most of you have been checking it out as it's been published, but if you haven't I can't recommend parts one , two , and three , Renee Gayo's list of the top 5 prospects yet to play in America , and everything else that DK's put on his blog on the subject enough. It's an awesome look in to the Bucs' international operation and how things have changed since Bob Nutting took the lack of Pirate presence in the reg...
Read more

The Pirates are talking to Mark Loretta

There are a couple of possible reactions when reading that the Pirates are talking to Mark Loretta . The easy reaction is, "Well, so long as he's replacing Chris Gomez, I'm fine with that." That's true. Loretta's a useful utility infielder that can still handle a bat fairly well and can play just about every position in the infield in a short-term capacity. In fact, he's probably a better hitter than Gomez and he can't really be a worse fielder. That may make him more the successor to Doug Mientkiewicz, which is fine by me as well. But then I started thinking. Aren't we trying to trade our shortstop away? Isn't "successor to Jack Wilson" a position that needs filled on the depth chart at the moment? I mean, I know Huntington's not looking at Loretta as a starting shortstop next year ... but what if he is? This is how the offseason drives people crazy. You can go months and months without hearing any rumors, then as soon as rumor...
Read more